- From: Ambrose Li via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 03:27:30 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
依英文排版的分類, 顏體比較接近書法體 (calligraphic type), 並非所謂斜體 (italic type)｡ 我的看法是日文的楷體一般也是書法體, 不是 italic｡ (中文 ｢斜體｣ 其實是誤譯, 英文傳統中 italic 並不指字體傾斜，而是指有 ｢flow｣ 和字形有行草 (cursive) 的結構｡) 中文楷體的用法基本上是石化了西方十六世紀前的用法。 -- GitHub Notification of comment by acli Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/409#issuecomment-997134556 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 18 December 2021 03:27:32 UTC