- From: himorin / Atsushi Shimono via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 06:18:44 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
it seems most of all related colleagues accept the proposal by @kidayasuo , let me take following actions around mid- this week (like May/12). Please leave comment/suggestion or emoji if you feel actions are fine or not. - rename `amendment`, `editorial`, `enhancement`, `errata`, `future`, `wording` labels with `jlreq-doc:` prefix, and have text something like `[JLReq-doc] ` as prefix in their description (to tell easily on a list of labels) - labels keep as is: `bug`, `duplicate`, `help wanted`, `invalid`, `wontfix` - Q: could be fine to remove `bug` (or keep as `jlreq-doc:bug` for formatting script issues?) and `help wanted`? - check all issues in `gap-analysis`, file new issue or relabel where appropriate, and remove this label (as in another issue #250 ) - add `reference-materials` label, and start working on #249 - check all issues without label, and attach appropriate label(s) -- GitHub Notification of comment by himorin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/248#issuecomment-835706385 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 9 May 2021 06:18:48 UTC