W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-archive@w3.org > January to March 2020

Re: [clreq] 建議提及楷體與西文cursive字體的作用區別 (#264)

From: Bobby Tung via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 11:34:38 +0000
To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-595184117-1583408077-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
中文楷、行、草等都符合CSS General Family「手書體」的定義。
楷體主要是活字印刷裡「替代手書」的一種字體,所以定義上對應font-family:cursive沒問題,與其他西文手書體混排並不好看,但也是一種折衷做法。

之前要求瀏覽器實作,主要是CSS Font Level 3裡頭沒打算新增Generic Family,現在新增了FangSong,未來如果針對各種語言新增的話,我建議CLREQ這邊可以按照需求提出Kai來對應,就不會與西文手書體混排。

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by bobbytung
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/264#issuecomment-595184117 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2020 11:34:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 18:09:41 UTC