W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-archive@w3.org > January to March 2020

Re: [i18n-activity] Example uses a timestamp for what should just be a (floating) date value (#650)

From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:30:37 +0000
To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-591402060-1582720236-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

The spec is now a Rec.  Which course of action should we take?
1. just close it
2. close with recycle label
3. send

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by r12a
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/650#issuecomment-591402060 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 12:30:39 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: r12a via GitHub: "[i18n-activity] new commits pushed by r12a"
Previous message: r12a via GitHub: "Re: [i18n-activity] Have fields for locale-specific information (names, addresses, etc.) been checked? (#640)"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Fuqiao Xue via GitHub: "Re: [i18n-activity] Example uses a timestamp for what should just be a (floating) date value (#650)"
Maybe reply: Fuqiao Xue via GitHub: "Re: [i18n-activity] Example uses a timestamp for what should just be a (floating) date value (#650)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 18:09:41 UTC