W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-archive@w3.org > January to March 2020

Re: [clreq] Remove some checkme in pinyin sections (#263)

From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 12:07:26 +0000
To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-590835009-1582632444-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The question for me is how one handles punctuation in annotations when using the word-based approach (ie. using group-ruby for words). There appear to be three alternatives in the samples we have seen in this thread:

[1] Add punctuation to the annotations by attaching an annotation over the punctuation in the base text (only), like this:
<img width="545" alt="75141037-14a83680-572b-11ea-9a83-a1cf19419842" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4839211/75245263-4cfc5300-57c5-11ea-9145-c5001725f55f.png">

[2] Don't add an annotation to the punctuation in the base line: add the punctuation instead to the previous annotation, like this:
<img width="545" alt="75141016-0a863800-572b-11ea-9d36-1cfddfc432d4" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4839211/75245435-9cdb1a00-57c5-11ea-8b64-336bbf18bf03.png">

[3] Group the base text punctuation with the preceding han character(s) and annotate both/all as a unit, like this:
![Screenshot 2020-02-25 at 11 56 47](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4839211/75246013-d3656480-57c6-11ea-9824-68303c839aa6.png)

Are all of these approaches ok?  Is it just down to the author as to which is chosen?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by r12a
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/263#issuecomment-590835009 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2020 12:07:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 18:09:41 UTC