- From: Fuqiao Xue via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 04:37:42 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Link to the note: https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/#h-note-283 (see especially the text after "To work around this issue...") The method in jlreq (and JIS X 4051) may be logically correct, but I still think the correct code point should be used in order to reduce confusion. ----- (FWIW, [clreq](https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/221#issuecomment-588024149) does not use this method. Personally, I think both the methods in clreq and jlreq have their own advantages, and are just different ways of thinking.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by xfq Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/185#issuecomment-643060167 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 12 June 2020 04:37:44 UTC