W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-archive@w3.org > April to June 2020

Re: [bp-i18n-specdev] Example interactive checklist (#23)

From: Joshua Bell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:30:38 +0000
To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-621385950-1588185037-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I'm going through this now for a spec, and I think the above response highlights that boolean checkboxes are not sufficient. It seems like a tri-state is needed:

* N/A - this is irrelevant to the specification (example: for an API that handles strings but not dates, that section is irrelevant; for an API that handles plain text and not markup, and/or does not render text, the layout questions are irrelevant)
* Yes - all is good; the recommendations are followed to the letter (e.g. UTF-8 is used as the encoding)
* No - this likely signals a problem (e.g. sorting is not locale-aware)

GitHub Notification of comment by inexorabletash
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/issues/23#issuecomment-621385950 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2020 18:30:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 18:09:41 UTC