W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-archive@w3.org > April to June 2020

Re: [jlreq] [simple-ruby] Not all jukugo ruby is like group ruby (#195)

From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:07:49 +0000
To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-608423116-1585919267-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

(also, the aspect of this issue that this is not specific to kata-tsuki ruby seems to be a duplicate, or at least a close relative of #27)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/195#issuecomment-608423116 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 3 April 2020 13:07:52 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: r12a via GitHub: "Re: [jlreq] [simple-ruby] 1-1-3 annotations in jukugo ruby (#27)"
Previous message: Florian Rivoal via GitHub: "[jlreq] new commits pushed by frivoal"
Maybe in reply to: Florian Rivoal via GitHub: "Re: [jlreq] [simple-ruby] Not all jukugo ruby is like group ruby (#195)"
Next in thread: r12a via GitHub: "Re: [jlreq] [simple-ruby] Not all jukugo ruby is like group ruby (#195)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 18:09:41 UTC