Re: [jlreq] [simple-ruby] 1-1-3 annotations in jukugo ruby (#27)

Ouch. Seems to me that that makes the overall handling of ruby (for those who want to do more than simple stuff) much more difficult to implement and describe.  I also think it will produce what some see as incorrect results, and some degree of confusion on top of the confusion that already exists around jukugo-ruby.  If we want to propose simple solutions for authors that don't do what jukugo-ruby normally does, perhaps we should simply say: if this is the case, then use group ruby instead.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by r12a
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/27#issuecomment-608349940 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 3 April 2020 10:06:52 UTC