Re: [i18n-activity] Mark ruby with rb rb* rt rt* at risk? #1424 (#570)

I think we need to establish a list of related issues already raised against the WhatWG spec and compare with this before closing.  At the last TPAC Chaals took an action to propose that WhatWG spec be updated to match W3C spec for ruby, including rb and rtc tags.  Nothing has yet happened.  We should spin up a project to move this forward once the string-meta topic has reduced in intensity.  In the meantime, i recommend to keep this tracker item open.

GitHub Notification of comment by r12a
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 11 July 2019 13:46:13 UTC