- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 09:49:21 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
> Your comment assumes that the simplified / traditional shape difference is a font style matter I'm assuming that it is the case for some characters, due to han unification, not all. In the case of Chinese, where the Hans / Hant contrast is relevant, the script designator has an impact on which glyph gets picked in the case of ambiguous ones, in addition to the language. I am just wondering whether it also has an impact if the language is `ko-`, and if that's the case, whether that informs which of `Hant` or `Hani` is more appropriate. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/klreq/issues/23#issuecomment-427307985 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 5 October 2018 09:50:40 UTC