- From: Huji Lee via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 03:59:55 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
As a non-expert, I am unable to produce such evidence or data. All I can say is to point out that in Table 5 of ISIRI 6219, the letter "Heh" is not shown in its separate form; whether it is shown as HEH+ZWJ (as Behnam says) is a speculation (the document itself does not provide evidence that it is HEH+ZWJ either), and that its footnote number 1 (right after the table) states that when there are multiple ways to produce the same glyph, it is preferred to use the form that uses only a single Unicode character (so if both HEH+ZWJ and HEH DOCHASHMEE are options, the latter is preferred). With that said, I am okay with either choice, i.e. if we keep it as HEH+ZWJ it is totally fine too, as far as I am concerned. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Huji Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/predefined-counter-styles/issues/23#issuecomment-398267259 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 03:59:58 UTC