- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:22:30 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
For the record, here is Murakami-san's reply: > I agree that the Gecko's behavior is pretty good, and I think the emphasis mark position should be consistent within a ruby element (empty annotations should match the behavior of auto-hidden). > > So both > `<em>ああ<ruby><rb>振<rb>り<rb>仮<rb>名<rt>ふ<rt>り<rt>が<rt>な</ruby>ああ</em>` > (auto-hidden ruby annotation for "り") > and > `<em>ああ<ruby><rb>振<rb>り<rb>仮<rb>名<rt>ふ<rt><rt>が<rt>な</ruby>ああ</em>` > (empty ruby annotation for "り") > should have the same result: > 、、、、 > 、、ふ がな、、 > ああ振り仮名ああ > > I think this behavior is reasonable for readability, and also because of the ruby layout structure (similar to the table structure, the cell position in a row should not change when a cell in the previous row is empty). I propose we close this issue, however it may be useful to capture the decision in jlreq or some supplement. -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/459#issuecomment-351969409 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 15 December 2017 10:22:44 UTC