- From: Behnam Esfahbod ❄ via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:46:05 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Thanks, @r12a, for the feedback. > why there's a need to change the ids from h_xxx to xxx Let's discuss this one on the meeting. > For the figure ids (and ids in general), i recommend that we don't use hyphen-minus. [...] It's a small thing, but it mounts up. I don't have a hard preference here, either. The reason I thought maybe we want to change is 1) the fact that most (or all) examples from ReSpec docs is with hyphen, and 2) being able to jump in the middle of the id to edit it easily while authoring. (Related to double-click, but it's a good thing for me.) Again, let's discuss in the meeting. > I recommend the following syntax for referring to Unicode code points, based on having tried lots of alternatives (I think we already agreed on this, but i could be mistaken). You're right. We did. We should use that syntax. I'll submit PR to fix them. One question, though: What is the expected different between `codepoint` and `uname` classes? -- GitHub Notification of comment by behnam Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/alreq/issues/150#issuecomment-340805335 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2017 15:46:06 UTC