- From: asmusf via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 04:50:48 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
On 10/25/2017 8:50 PM, Addison Phillips wrote: > > "if possible" is technically accurate and the wording is extremely > careful. The Note @asmusf <https://github.com/asmusf> cites is > directly above the note box. However, I agree that this is potentially > confusing. I added a new paragraph to the note box: > > Users are cautioned that the resulting character sequence can > still contain combining marks: not all character sequences have a > precomposed equivalent and some scripts depend on combining marks > for encoding. There are even cases where a given base character > and combining mark are not replaced with a precomposed character > because the combination is "blocked" by another combining mark in > the sequence. > > This text does seem a bit repetitious, but maybe that's an advantage? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/125#issuecomment-339543335>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANbTHnbAc33L1Uy_Fa59VTZ1M1-QDNauks5swAGJgaJpZM4P-CmU>. > yes -- GitHub Notification of comment by asmusf Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/125#issuecomment-339550553 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2017 04:50:49 UTC