- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:03:04 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
> I post here, but I wonder if it should not also be in the repository of samples of typographic, just created by Richard You're posting in exactly the right place. That repo is only for pictures, not connected arguments. ;-) > The justification with Tatweel (U+0640, ـ , small flat line) goes better to the first type of font (a). Bear in mind that in a web browser the width of the text is usually fluid. This is particularly problematic for justification of any text where the content author has added tatweels, since they will only work to justify the text if the window they are created in and the window they are viewed in are the same width exactly. It's possible that a justification tool could add tatweel characters while justifying, in the way a justification tool for English would add spacing. This would work, though i'm told that such results don't please the eye. -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/alreq/issues/57#issuecomment-281388062 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2017 16:03:11 UTC