- From: aphillips via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 00:51:06 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
I agree with @duerst and @asmusf. In particular, the purpose here is
to point out a character whose Unicode case mapping is 'full' rather
than 'simple'. Right or wrong (although I happen to think it is
right), the sharp S meets that criterion.
I happen to think it is correct because, in addition to personal
experience, etc., I recall the debate when U+1E9E was encoded. The
main purpose cited then was, IIRC, to provide a code point for
uppercase equivalent glyphs for cases like ALL CAPS TITLES in printing
such as Martin mentions Duden using.
The Unicode FAQ is helpful here:
> In standard German orthography, the sharp s ("ß") is uppercased to
a sequence of two capital S
> characters. This is a longstanding practice, and is reflected in the
default case mappings in
> Unicode. A capital form of ß is attested in a number of instances,
and has thus been encoded in
> the Unicode Standard. However, this character is not widely used,
and is not recognized in the
> official orthography as the uppercase form of ß. Therefore, the
original mapping to "SS" is
> retained in the Unicode character properties.
I'll address locale vs. language in a separate comment.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by aphillips
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/68#issuecomment-180899664
using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 7 February 2016 00:51:08 UTC