- From: aphillips via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 00:51:06 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
I agree with @duerst and @asmusf. In particular, the purpose here is to point out a character whose Unicode case mapping is 'full' rather than 'simple'. Right or wrong (although I happen to think it is right), the sharp S meets that criterion. I happen to think it is correct because, in addition to personal experience, etc., I recall the debate when U+1E9E was encoded. The main purpose cited then was, IIRC, to provide a code point for uppercase equivalent glyphs for cases like ALL CAPS TITLES in printing such as Martin mentions Duden using. The Unicode FAQ is helpful here: > In standard German orthography, the sharp s ("ß") is uppercased to a sequence of two capital S > characters. This is a longstanding practice, and is reflected in the default case mappings in > Unicode. A capital form of ß is attested in a number of instances, and has thus been encoded in > the Unicode Standard. However, this character is not widely used, and is not recognized in the > official orthography as the uppercase form of ß. Therefore, the original mapping to "SS" is > retained in the Unicode character properties. I'll address locale vs. language in a separate comment. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aphillips Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/68#issuecomment-180899664 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 7 February 2016 00:51:08 UTC