- From: asmusf via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 02:56:28 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
I like the new language, but perhaps it's best to not lose the explicit statement of backward compatibility. Why not add at the end: "it is also backwards compatible with the [ISO lists.]" (The text in [ ] should probably be rephrased a bit, as "ISO lists" isn't very clear.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by asmusf Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/issues/13#issuecomment-226668702 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 17 June 2016 02:56:30 UTC