- From: asmusf via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:17:03 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
On 4/4/2016 11:58 AM, r12a wrote: > > I think we may still be missing John's original point, which is in > some ways the opposite of the (useful) information we have so far. If > you consider ø, a developer may expect that it will match the > decomposed sequence, but it won't, since it doesn't have a > decomposition rule. > > So it's one thing that identical glyphs may not represent the same > character, but it's another that identical letters may be represented > by different and non-normalisable character sequences. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/69#issuecomment-205448027> > Never forget that the "sequences" in question can all be singletons for the same (identical) letter shape. There's no requirement for this effect to be limited to cases involving combining marks. A./ -- GitHub Notification of comment by asmusf Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/69#issuecomment-205476887 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 4 April 2016 20:17:04 UTC