- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:58:21 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
i struggled with how to represent rtl text in examples when writing the educational articles on the w3c site. I think the article at http://www.w3.org/International/articles/inline-bidi-markup/ shows my approach at its most evolved state - see the explanation in the purple box and look at the examples to see whether they look workable. we're about to move to a new document style that imposes a 50em max width on the main text column, although if needed we should be able to use wider tables and diagrams. That should give you a rule of thumb for the overall size. Any caption text should be in the caption element. It would be good to keep other explanatory text in an image to a minimum. For Arabic text, i recommend a size that is big enough for non-arabic-using people to clearly see what's going on. it is possible to use SVG (it's used already in the clreq and tlreq docs). in W3C docs it is common to use [DOCNAME] type links to the references section. I never thought this was very helpful. It springs from academic rather than practical sources. I recommend that links in the document link directly to the document being cited, and to the relevant place inside that document. We can also use the [DOCNAME] links to provide information about the name of the document, if useful. here's a style guide that you may find useful http://www.w3.org/International/docs/styleguide. See also the respec guidelines (esp. for things like linking to definitions, figures, etc.) https://www.w3.org/respec/ref.html hope that helps -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/alreq/issues/13#issuecomment-159312767 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2015 15:58:29 UTC