W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-archive@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: [bp-i18n-specdev] legacy grapheme clusters vs extended grapheme clusters

From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:23:23 +0000
To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-149567001-1445347402-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

That's typically been what I've guessed should be the correct answer, 
but without really knowing why. And this specification looks like a 
great place to enlighten people in my situation.

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by frivoal
See 
https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/issues/1#issuecomment-149567001

Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 13:23:29 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: None via GitHub: "[bp-i18n-specdev] Spell out internationalization in place of 'i18n'"
Previous message: r12a via GitHub: "Re: [bp-i18n-specdev] legacy grapheme clusters vs extended grapheme clusters"
In reply to: Florian Rivoal via GitHub: "[bp-i18n-specdev] legacy grapheme clusters vs extended grapheme clusters"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 18:09:34 UTC