- From: via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:12:00 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
r12a has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/clreq: == second set of bullet points in 1.2 How This Document Was Created == http://w3c.github.io/clreq/#basic_principles_for_development_of_this_document in the zh version, section 1.2 has just three bullet points. http://w3c.github.io/clreq/zh/#basic_principles_for_development_of_this_document in hackpad there was text for another set of bullet points (which i include below for reference). should clreq include these additional bullet points or not? (they are already in the en version, so the question is whether to delete from the en version or add to the zh version). text in question follows: ========================= This document mainly adopts the following policies to explain the features of Chinese composition: It does not fully cover all details of the Chinese composition system, but mainly describes the differences from Western composition systems. It explains in detail the similarities and differences between traditional and Simplified Chinese composition. It describes features of Chinese composition that differ from those mentioned in Requirements for Japanese Text Layout. It describes presentational results and considers these results as issues and requirements for Chinese text layout. Meanwhile, it offers principles or methods for for handling these issues, without describing particular technological solutions. It suggests solutions for, or explains, present-day issues that people face in Chinese composition. It provides typical instances of Chinese composition and their actual use cases as much as possible. In consideration of non-Chinese readers of this document, figures are used for explanation wherever possible. It mainly explains modern Chinese publications. Looking back to the publications in the time of movable type, there may be some differences, but they are still considered part of Chinese composition. The document does not yet fully cover ancient books. Future editions may be revised with such features in mind. For non-Chinese readers, frequency of use is indicated for each requirement. These frequencies are not the outcome of any accurate research, but arise from the long experience of the authors. Non-Chinese readers should understand that they are intuitive for ordinary Chinese readers. These frequencies provide only rough information to prioritize the importance of issues. The main target of this document is common books. Other publications, such as magazines or newspapers, are also included. See https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/52
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2015 11:12:09 UTC