- From: via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:12:00 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
r12a has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/clreq:
== second set of bullet points in 1.2 How This Document Was Created ==
http://w3c.github.io/clreq/#basic_principles_for_development_of_this_document
in the zh version, section 1.2 has just three bullet points.
http://w3c.github.io/clreq/zh/#basic_principles_for_development_of_this_document
in hackpad there was text for another set of bullet points (which i
include below for reference).
should clreq include these additional bullet points or not? (they are
already in the en version, so the question is whether to delete from
the en version or add to the zh version).
text in question follows:
=========================
This document mainly adopts the following policies to explain the
features of Chinese composition:
It does not fully cover all details of the Chinese composition
system, but mainly describes the differences from Western composition
systems.
It explains in detail the similarities and differences between
traditional and Simplified Chinese composition.
It describes features of Chinese composition that differ from
those mentioned in Requirements for Japanese Text Layout.
It describes presentational results and considers these results as
issues and requirements for Chinese text layout. Meanwhile, it offers
principles or methods for for handling these issues, without
describing particular technological solutions.
It suggests solutions for, or explains, present-day issues that
people face in Chinese composition.
It provides typical instances of Chinese composition and their
actual use cases as much as possible.
In consideration of non-Chinese readers of this document, figures
are used for explanation wherever possible.
It mainly explains modern Chinese publications. Looking back to
the publications in the time of movable type, there may be some
differences, but they are still considered part of Chinese
composition. The document does not yet fully cover ancient books.
Future editions may be revised with such features in mind.
For non-Chinese readers, frequency of use is indicated for each
requirement. These frequencies are not the outcome of any accurate
research, but arise from the long experience of the authors.
Non-Chinese readers should understand that they are intuitive for
ordinary Chinese readers. These frequencies provide only rough
information to prioritize the importance of issues.
The main target of this document is common books. Other
publications, such as magazines or newspapers, are also included.
See https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/52
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2015 11:12:09 UTC