- From: Christian Rebischke <christian.rebischke@tu-clausthal.de>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:07:04 +0100
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- CC: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
Martynas, I don't think I understood you yet. Can you give a short example on what I can do with LDT and not with Hydra? If I understood you correctly, the difference is that LDT enables more insight into the service and answers the question:"What is the service doing". So with LDT it would be possible to gain information about the Web services internal functionality? Not sure if I understood you. Christian On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:51:59PM +0100, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > Christian, > > like I mentioned, LDT enables declarative Linked Data API definitions > - I think that is the major difference. > With that I mean that all the CRUD logic of such API is contained in > the LDT ontology that carries the definition. A description like Hydra > only describes the surface interface while the logic is hidden away in > the implementation source code. > > LDT also has formal semantics. That is, the evaluation of read/write > Linked Data requests against an LDT application is specified formally. > That is quite unique IMO, comparable to algebra definition in SPARQL > for example. > > > Martynas > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:39 PM Christian Rebischke > <christian.rebischke@tu-clausthal.de> wrote: > > > > Hi Martynas, > > > > can you examine how linked-Data-Templates is different to Hydra? > > What are its advantages and what its weaknesses? > > > > Or does it have a totally different prupose? > > > > Christian > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:32:10PM +0100, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > > > Christian, > > > > > > I'd like to add Linked Data Templates: > > > https://atomgraph.github.io/Linked-Data-Templates/ > > > > > > LDT defines Linked Data APIs (by mapping them to SPARQL), not merely > > > describes them. > > > > > > Disclaimer: I'm the author :) > > > > > > > > > Martynas > > > atomgraph.com > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:18 PM Christian Rebischke > > > <christian.rebischke@tu-clausthal.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Sorry for the increased noise on that mailing list. > > > > I have another question about a different topic. > > > > > > > > Can you tell me, what is the exact difference of Hydra compared to > > > > established Semantic Web API descriptions like OWL-S, WSMO, Restful > > > > Grounding, etc? > > > > > > > > I didn't understand yet, why you invented something new. > > > > A pointer to a paper would be enough if you have one. > > > > > > > > OWL-S: https://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/ > > > > WSMO: https://www.w3.org/Submission/WSMO/ > > > > Restful Grounding: https://otaviofff.github.io/restful-grounding/ > > > > > > > > Christian > > > >
Received on Friday, 21 February 2020 12:07:24 UTC