- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 21:08:57 +0200
- To: "'Hydra'" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Thanks Pavlik for scribing. The minutes from this week's telecon are now available at http://www.hydra-cg.com/minutes/2017-05-01/ The full text of the discussion is below, including a link to the audio transcript. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydra W3C Community Group Telecon Minutes for 2017-05-01 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/community/hydra/wiki/Conference_Calls Topics: 1. Discuss Karol's PRs #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 Resolutions: 1. Merge PR #113, #114, and #115 Chair: Markus Lanthaler Scribe: elf Pavlik Present: elf Pavlik, Markus Lanthaler, Karol Szczepański, Tomasz Pluskiewicz Audio: http://www.hydra-cg.org/minutes/2017-05-01/audio.mp3 elf Pavlik: present+ elf-pavlik elf Pavlik is scribing. Topic: Discuss Karol's PRs #113 #114 #115 #116 #117 present+ karol-szczepanski present+ tpluskiewicz Markus Lanthaler: thank you karol-szczepanski for your PRs Karol Szczepański: i consider them ready and they stay open for discussion ... i plan to craft couple more PRs ... i already took into account all the comments which i received in first few days ... so far no one reviewed #117 Markus Lanthaler: I would be fine with merging those already reviewed ... good job karol-szczepanski Markus Lanthaler: zakim, ack I don't understand 'ack', markus Tomasz Pluskiewicz: agrees, merge them (those which received review) ... later we can follow up with more PRs proposing changes Markus Lanthaler: zakim, ack tpluskiewicz I see no one on the speaker queue elf Pavlik: +1 Tomasz Pluskiewicz: i will prepare PRs when I see need to change something, this may make it easier to manage Markus Lanthaler: should we vote on merging first 3 PRs? PROPOSAL: Merge PR #113, #114, and #115 elf Pavlik: +1 Markus Lanthaler: +1 Tomasz Pluskiewicz: +1 Karol Szczepański: +! RESOLUTION: Merge PR #113, #114, and #115 Markus Lanthaler: I'll go ahead and merge them after the telecon ... other one's just need review on github or we should discuss something now? Karol Szczepański: i would prefer to get some proper review on github Markus Lanthaler: how this will drive further actions? ... we have some use cases and should discuss which of them current spec already covers ... regarding client development, i don't have time myself but if someone want to spearhead it I welcome it very much Karol Szczepański: one of your comments on PR, related to you preference of generic Use Cases ... all UC which I created were more specific ... I see benefits in working with more specific use cases ... they can lead to solutions to real specific problems Markus Lanthaler: to clarify, i didn't mean to do all generic, other ones seamed to have generic use cases on just one i commented on had specific one Karol Szczepański: I think about more use cases ... getting deeper some Use Cases would stay specific for particular domains ... eg. calendars ... generic UCs could miss some cases Markus Lanthaler: what do you think about what i proposed, to have generic use case and for it specific ones ... we can make new PRs for that Tomasz Pluskiewicz: +1 on future PRs to add generic UC descriptions elf Pavlik: +1 Markus Lanthaler: people reading it may get impression that it only covers those specific UCs ... having generic UCs mentioned can prevent that Markus Lanthaler: would you like to discuss some of the UCs ? ... it doesn't seem that Ruben will join so we shouldn't discuss arch diagram Markus Lanthaler: zakim, ack tpluskiewicz I see no one on the speaker queue Tomasz Pluskiewicz: new requests still need review, we could send email to mailing list to remind others about them ... I have one UC related to #100 (IRI templates & operations) Markus Lanthaler: are you sure you talk about #100 ? Tomasz Pluskiewicz: #118 Markus Lanthaler: https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/118 ... they all stay linked ... I'll prepare PR related to it Markus Lanthaler: zakim, ack karol-szczepanski I see no one on the speaker queue Karol Szczepański: i was also thinking about it, and i also don't find it in current spec very clear how to handle such UCs ... i'll let tpluskiewicz submit PR for that Markus Lanthaler: anyone plans to work on something? let's mention it so we avoid possible duplication of efforts Tomasz Pluskiewicz: I'll just focus on this one (related to #118) Markus Lanthaler: from my side I don't see anything to discuss, any proposals to add to today's agenda, or should we finish early Karol Szczepański: I will take time in next 2 weeks to write more UCs, but I also want to think how we should use UCs ... we could try to make some kind of roadmap for next couple of weeks Markus Lanthaler: I'd like to have some concrete proposals for changes in the spec, discuss them during telecons and vote on them ... what would do you think karol-szczepanski ? Karol Szczepański: adding more examples on the specification page Tomasz Pluskiewicz: we could make it the other way around, to link to UCs from the spec ... keeping spec shorter Markus Lanthaler: you need to decide if it stands as normative or informative reference everything normative needs to stay in the spec itself Tomasz Pluskiewicz: UCs act as informative (non-normative) references Markus Lanthaler: we should at lest publish them on HydraCG website ... i can take Action item Markus Lanthaler: zakim, ack elf-pavlik I see no one on the speaker queue elf Pavlik: I noted some specs like LDP have separate use case documents [scribe assist by Markus Lanthaler] elf Pavlik: That way use cases can be referenced without being included in the spec [scribe assist by Markus Lanthaler] Markus Lanthaler: ... but just referenced from the spec Markus Lanthaler: fine if it acts just as additional (educational) material Markus Lanthaler: anything else we should discuss today ? ... let's adjourn for today and finish early, i will use that time to review PR #116 and #117 Markus Lanthaler: thank your everyone, let's meet again in 2 weeks Markus Lanthaler: zakim, list attendees As of this point the attendees have been elf-pavlik, karol-szczepanski, tpluskiewicz, markus
Received on Monday, 1 May 2017 19:09:35 UTC