Re: architecture: detailed outline

Dear all,

Does anybody have any feedback on the proposed architecture for the Hydra Core Vocabulary?
Even if you think it's a very bad or very good idea, it's very useful to hear from you.

We need to start from somewhere to make progress with Hydra,
so alternatives are definitely welcome as well.

Best,

Ruben

On 07 Mar 2017, at 15:41, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> Following an earlier announcement of a high-level architectural diagram [1],
> and incorporating your comments in that thread,
> I'm now suggesting a more detailed look into the component groups:
> https://github.com/RubenVerborgh/Hydra-Architecture-Diagram/blob/master/README.md#components
> 
> The document details what each of the component groups would do,
> and how they work together. Also, dependencies are explained.
> 
> Your feedback is most welcome.
> My goal is to incorporate your input into a final first version,
> which would then be used as a basis for moving on with Hydra
> in focused interest groups per topic*.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Ruben
> 
> *For instance, our team is really eager to contribute to Filtering and Paging.
> 
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2016Dec/0024.html

Received on Sunday, 26 March 2017 16:36:44 UTC