Re: Hydra Status

After this discussion I'm even less clear on who the intended audience
is for Hydra is. Only people who are primarily focused on RDF?

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Ruben Verborgh <Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be> wrote:
>> What I think we are sorely missing at the moment, is a group of *dedicated and committed* core contributors that push the development of Hydra forward.
>
> Count me in!
>
> Also, we'll need a clear driving force IMHO,
> a committee of 1–3 people coordinating everything.
>
>> We can also revisit Hydra's overall architecture but I'm a bit skeptical about such an effort if we can't reach consensus on something as fundamental as collections.
>
> That is precisely why we should revisit it.
>
> Ruben

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:28:35 UTC