Re: Hydra Status

I need to disagree about re. JSON-LD. It is only one of RDF standards,
useful in a Javascript environment.

Turtle is more readable, RDF/XML is useful in an XML environment. It does
not mean is better than the others.

The strength of RDF that is a datamodel that has multiple syntaxes.

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 at 22.29, Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no> wrote:

> 2016-11-10 20:55 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>:
>
> > The steps I would perform would include first and foremost:
> >
> > 1. cleaning up GitHub issues
> > 2. bringing the spec up to date
> > 3. implementing crucial features which are offered by the alternatives
> > (c'mon paging and filtering is still in flux!)
>
> Yes, please!
>
> The GitHub model obviously works. Issues for discussions and when we
> reach a conclusion (or at least some kind of consensus), someone can
> be assigned to submit a pull request for the specification and
> possibly examples, etc., implementing what’s been agreed upon.
>
> > Only then I would proceed with new and more "Semantic Web" feature we all
> > want Hydra to be known for.
>
> I so want this to become a reality. I think it’s obvious that JSON-LD
> is the current best standard for linked data and Hydra is the only
> hypermedia control format built on JSON-LD that I know of. Combined,
> that’s an unbeatable combination. In a finished state, Hydra is going
> to beat Siren, HAL, Collection+JSON et al in almost every thinkable
> way. The world needs Hydra! :)
>
> > Oh and I forgot a fourth point - we need more examples!
>
> Indeed. The spec should be chock-full of them.
>
> --
> Asbjørn Ulsberg           -=|=-        asbjorn@ulsberg.no
> «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
>
>