- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:25:00 +0200
- To: Karol Szczepañski <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>
- Cc: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Hi Karol, > Can anyone explain how a call can improve anything here? From my experience, > the more participants and the longer the call, nothing comes out of such a > meeting. A call is a (bi-)weekly meeting, which forces one to have something done. It really helps improve commitment. Plus higher bandwidth and more nuance. It's like going to the weight watchers every week; much easier to stay committed and on track, than if we all try it on ourselves. Regarding this, I want to emphasize: >> I don't mind Hydra having a group of >> "core" members that take on a larger responsibility and them having >> meetings any way they wish, but I do mind it if that excludes anyone >> in any way. Minutes from these meetings and the concrete result of >> them should end up in the same tool and process the rest of the Hydra >> community uses. I wouldn't suggest in any way to exclude anybody; and minutes would be the way to go. Best, Ruben
Received on Monday, 23 May 2016 19:25:33 UTC