Re: moving forward—with a plan

Hi Hydrarians,

I think we should do the following:

1.) Harvest low-hanging-froots -- mainly the new collection design -- I 
don't know what prevents us from putting it to the spec.
2.) Call for consensus on things that "just" need to be decided, like 
issue #90 [1].
3.) Take decisions of principle for the filter design -- do we want to 
have powerful filtering/ querying support or not?

I think this would free the knot and allow us to move on -- especially 
the last point.

The success of even half-baked technologies also proves that
an analysis paralysis (in that I think we are) mean death to more 
elaborated solutions
although they might be more ambitious (e. g. HTML5 vs. XHTML).

BG, Thomas

[1] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/90

Received on Sunday, 22 May 2016 16:55:43 UTC