RE: Filters as views (ISSUE-45)

On 14 Jan 2016 at 21:20, Karol Szczepański wrote:
> While mostly we're talking about collections being sets of members where a
> member is 'just' an identifier, I believe there is still case (several times
> raised on this forum) of a SPARQL/SQL equivalent of SELECT clause. It would
> be possible to have a view that actually doesn't filter members, but their
> properties. I don't know if it has anything to do with the collection itself
> as I'm not fully sure if I understand correctly term "member" here.

Yep, we need to keep that in mind. That is the perfect example of a view. A sub-collection doesn't make much sense in that case.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 21:30:31 UTC