RE: Filters as views (ISSUE-45)

• From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
• Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:52:09 +0100
• To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <044701d14d8b$de949f50$9bbdddf0$@gmx.net>

On 12 Jan 2016 at 22:10, Karol Szczepański wrote:
> Hi Markus
> 
>> If you don't like this approach, could you please point out in the examples
>> what exactly you don't like. Could you, in that case, please also rewrite
>> the examples to illustrate how you would see this working with the
>> alternate
>> proposal.
>> 
>> From my perspective is good enough as it doesn't create separate constructs
> for paging and filtering - in both examples presented we're using views
> which I like. I'd probably prefer to move both to the term of 'filter'
> (as I had this conversation with Ruben), but still being consequent here
> is OK for me.
> 
> The only objection I could made is that whe we're not keen to move the
> paging to that templating mechanism as well:

Actually, this proposal paves the way for that :-)
But let's first see if we reach consensus on the proposed design.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2016 22:52:43 UTC