- From: Thomas Hoppe <thomas.hoppe@n-fuse.de>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:37:12 +0100
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
- Message-ID: <569377C8.1040409@n-fuse.de>
Hi Martynas, Kingsley thanks for your feedback. I agree that some if not most points on this slide are no longer valid, that's why the heading says "". This slide should describe how the Sem Web stuff was in the past _and_ how it was perceived by industry people which were not involved with these technologies. BG, Thomas On 01/06/2016 01:29 PM, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > Nice slides indeed, however I would disagree about most issues of the > Semantic Web: > > Triplestores: > - immature, > - slow, > -only few implementations (very few commercial). > > SPARQL: > - complex > - few implementations, > - inappropriate for many real-world problems. > > > In my experience, SPARQL is intuitive (much more so than SQL) and > appropriate for very many real-world problems. And there's plenty of > implementations, both commercial and open-source: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_subject-predicate-object_databases > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Colin Maudry <colin@maudry.com> wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> Great document, both concise and clear for a techie audience. Thanks! >> >> Colin >> >> On 06/01/16 10:09, Thomas Hoppe wrote: >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> I compared Hydra to other approaches in general a bit here: >> >> http://vanthome.github.io/rest-api-essay-presentation/rest_apis.html#28 >> >> BG, Thomas >> >> On 01/04/2016 01:14 PM, Paul Mackay wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I’m iterating on a couple of API projects and have been reviewing the status >> of current API specification projects. JSON API >> (http://www.cerebris.com/blog/2015/06/04/jsonapi-1-0/) reached v1.0 earlier >> this year and is more comprehensive than HAL (see http://jsonapi.org/faq/). >> I suspect Hydra could be even more flexible and comprehensive in terms of >> defining an API. However within the JSON API community that spec is being >> promoted as an anti-bikeshedding tool (avoid lots of debate about small >> issues) and yet getting to 1.0 involved a lot of bikeshedding! >> >> Has there been any comparisons between JSON API and Hydra, and what is >> behind the design choices of Hydra? I suppose a similar FAQ for Hydra along >> the lines of why it goes beyond other API framework specifications would be >> great :) >> >> Thanks >> >> Paul >> >> >> -- >> Paul Mackay | 07761 050542 | www.folklabs.com >> >> >>
Received on Monday, 11 January 2016 09:38:02 UTC