- From: Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:05:25 +0100
- To: "Pierre-Antoine Champin" <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "Maik Riechert" <maik.riechert@arcor.de>
- Cc: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, <public-hydra@w3.org>
Hi >Tom: Does there seem to be a consensus to separate views and view >templates? It does for me. >Pierre: That last point being state, I feel sympathy with Ruben's idea that >views could be considered as collections of their own. I'd be careful about this. While I also stated before that view is a collection (or the opposite - collection is a specific view of itself). Only issue I started to have about this is how i.e. deleting a member from a view affects the "owning" collection? >Tom: Ditto. I like the term derived resource. And let me illustrate an >example I mentioned earlier of views used outside of collections... While this example is not a perfect one (I think language should a subject for HTTP header layer negotiation), but I (and probably few other) rised an idea of having a views of non-collection resources. I've added yet another example on how it could work at the address Tom provided: https://www.w3.org/community/hydra/wiki/Views_of_non-collection Best Karol
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 22:05:10 UTC