- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:45:19 +0100
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 11 Feb 2016 at 10:22, Tomasz Pluskiewicz wrote: > February 11 2016 10:20 AM, "Tomasz Pluskiewicz" <tomasz@t-code.pl> wrote: >> >> My rationale was that with view and view template separated it's easier >> for the client to determine that current resource is a view by simply >> checking the existence of that relation. A separate property for view >> would make it trivially possible to @reverse so that JSON-LD root >> becomes the view itself. With views and templates mixed, that would be >> awkward. Please see the examples I created on the wiki [1]. >> > > Sorry I forgot the link: > > [1] https://www.w3.org/community/hydra/wiki/Views_and_templates_separate Thanks, I added a section containing links to those alternative proposals at the end of my initial proposal: https://www.w3.org/community/hydra/wiki/Collection_Interaction_Flow#Other_Proposals -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 21:45:51 UTC