Re: Collections with typed members

Hi Maxim

Your suggestions are correct. Still, I believe the issue is that we still 
haven't decide which path should we go.

Indeed using RDFS/OWL constructs is troublesome from client point of view.
>From the other hand, using SHACL or VoID (and possible other vocabs) 
enforces client to know more and more which complicates things.

Hydra doesn't say excplicitely what client MUST understand in this matter in 
order to perform these tasks. From my perspective (active coder with 
pragmatic point of view) it grows to a threat that using Hydra won't be easy 
as there will be always something extra added that client will need to 
understand in order to discover the API and let the server drive it 
correctly.

Best

Karol 

Received on Monday, 8 February 2016 19:27:54 UTC