- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>
- Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 20:45:54 +0100
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
Hi Markus I like it in general. I'm just a bit uneasy about multiple PartialCollectionViews, each with it's own totalItems. I think that there should only be one such view in a response. In my opinion, if GETting /markus/friends?first=Ruben redirects (or uses Content-Location header) than the view is actually the first page and not the initial target. Also I'm not sure about mixing both ViewTemplate and View on single `view` property. I'm thinking about a more general term instead of PartialCollectionView on the grounds that views don't necessarily apply only to collections. Would View and PartialView be enough? The former in cases where the representation is complete but for example translated. The latter for filtered collections and abridged representations alike (such as when limiting the number of properties included). Lastly, I think that the filterSpecification will have to be discussed in detail separately and must not hold us back from agreeing upon the general view structure. Is it possible the we leave the filters a bit underspecified and resolve views first? Actually I raised more suggestion that I'd initially intended. Would you like me to write them down on the wiki in similar fashion? Regards, Tom On 2016-02-07 17:51, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > Hi, > > I think there might have been some confusion and misunderstanding regarding > the proposal I sent out a while ago. I slightly refined it and wrote down an > exemplary interaction flow at > > https://www.w3.org/community/hydra/wiki/Collection_Interaction_Flow > > Please have a look and let me know what you think. If you disagree we > certain aspects and want to propose an alternative, please either create a > new (!) page or describe your proposal based on an example in a mail. > > > Thanks, > Markus > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 7 February 2016 19:46:43 UTC