Re: Filters as views (ISSUE-45)

I was thinking about this a bit. Ruben, how would you attach the parent 
collection to your alternative definition view? I think this is very 
crucial since you typically want to define search/filter operations on 
the parent collection and not the view.

Cheers
Maik

> +1 to the alternative definition, seems more clean. I always found it
> strange that the current "view" definition doesn't really contain
> anything, except the navigation controls. Makes more sense to me to
> attach those directly to the collection page.
>
> Cheers
> Maik
>
> Am 13.01.2016 um 22:46 schrieb Ruben Verborgh:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Here's a first go at definitions:
> >
> > – A collection is a set of members that somehow logically belong together.
> > – A view is a subset of those members of a collection that satisfy a particular condition.
> > – A page is a view that selects members based on their position in a specific ordering of the collection.
> >
> > Alternative definition of view if it is going to be a subclass of collection:
> > – A view is a collection which contains those members of a parent collection that satisfy a particular condition.
> > I would really argue for this, since then we can reuse all the collection stuff on view.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Ruben

Received on Monday, 1 February 2016 16:42:26 UTC