- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:23:14 +0100
- To: "'Hydra'" <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 22 Dez 2016 at 13:25, Tomasz Pluskiewicz wrote: > Everything below sounds good. I wouldn't discount PRs to the spec itself > but I see your point. Great > Regarding the main spec, what do you think about splitting it into smaller chunks and using > respec's include feature[1]? I'm also collaborating with the author so that it works correctly > with markdown includes [2]. It could further lower the entry barrier. I don't think it has much to do with the size of the document, more with its nature. Writing a good specification is neither simple nor fun. > Regarding drafts, I'd like to add one for collections based on what we have in the wiki. I > understand that Ruben will come back soon with something on those matters as well? AFAIK Ruben will focus more on a high-level architectural diagram or something similar. Please go ahead and file a PR for a collections draft.. no need to wait. Thanks, Markus > [1]: https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki/data--include > [2]: https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/993 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2016 14:23:38 UTC