- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:48:11 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
Hi Tom, On 15 Mrz 2016 at 18:13, Tomasz Pluskiewicz wrote: > I noticed that you're not consistent wrt predicates used on > hydra:Property vs other vocabulary elements: > > 1. Class, Operation and Link use rdfs:label and rdfs:description > 2. Property is annotated by hydrs:title and hydra:description > > The current spec isn't too explicit about this although throughout the > samples only hydra:label and hydra:description is ever used. Good catch. I went back and forth on that and probably never fully updated those demos. > So should both rdfs:* and hydra:* properties be supported or is the > issue tracker sample wrong? My current take is that a Hydra client should first look for hydra:label and hydra:description and then, optionally, fall back to properties from other vocabularies (I would propose RDFS and Schema.org). Have a look at ISSUE-1 [3] :-) > Also I think it should be clearly documented in the specification. Yep Cheers, Markus > [1]: http://nancyfx.org > [2]: http://www.sinatrarb.com/ [3] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/1 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2016 19:48:44 UTC