Re: ODP: ODP: Re: Replace hydra:Error with application/problem+json

Hi Asbjørn,
 

> On September 27, 2015 at 11:37 PM Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjornu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  Why do we need both? Can’t application/problem+json be JSON-LD compatible
> without announcing it in its Content-Type? Or is it expected that everything
> that is JSON-LD compatible will use application/ld+json as its content type?
> 

You can just add a Link header to the response to reference to the context that
can be used to interpret an ordinary JSON documents as JSON-LD.

You can find more info abotu this in the JSON-LD rec:

http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#interpreting-json-as-json-ld

Regards,

John

>  -- 
>  Asbjørn Ulsberg          -=|=-         asbjorn@ulsberg.no
> <mailto:asbjorn@ulsberg.no>
>  «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
> 
> 
> 
>  On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Karol Szczepański
> <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com <mailto:karol.szczepanski@gmail.com> > wrote:
> 
>    > > 
> >    OK, I see your point now.
> > 
> >    Server may take into account accepted media types client sent and choose
> > between RDF (if applicable) or not. It still may ignore it and consider a
> > response as a subject not for content negotation and come with bare
> > ‘problem’ media type.
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    Regards
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    Karol Szczepański
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> > 
> >    Od: Dietrich Schulten
> >    Wysłano: niedziela, 27 września 2015 15:38
> >    Do: public-hydra@w3.org
> >    Temat: Re: ODP: Re: Replace hydra:Error with application/problem+json
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    Hi Karol,
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    that was a misunderstanding.
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    Am 27.09.2015 um 13:56 schrieb Karol Szczepański:
> > 
> >    > Hi
> > 
> >    >
> > 
> >    > Your approach would put non-RDF clients to problem as you suggest to
> > 
> >    > respond with application/ld+json instead of application/problem+json.
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    That was not my intention at all.
> > 
> >    The idea is: *If* a client says in its POST that it accepts
> > 
> >    application/ld+json, then the service might respond with
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    Content-Type: application/ld+json
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    If another client comes to the same service and accepts
> > 
> >    application/json, then the server might respond with
> > 
> >    application/problem+json, similarly for XML.
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    The rules of conneg apply, of course. The server may respond whatever it
> > 
> >    wants to.
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >    Best,
> > 
> >    Dietrich
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >     
> > 
> >  >