Re: about those bonus points...

I’d love to see this. We’ve developed Pomona, also as an alternative to Web
API, which we plan on integrating Hydra and JSON-LD into.

http://pomona.io/

We have a branch with a new serialization format based on JSON-LD working
and will start looking into replacing JSON Schema with Hydra. It will be
interesting to look into how other people are doing this in the .NET world.
-- 
Asbjørn Ulsberg           -=|=-        asbjorn@ulsberg.no
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»


2015-09-21 17:55 GMT+02:00 Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>:

> Hi Pano
>
> As Tomasz Pluskiewicz stated (thanks Tomek!), my project is a .net
> alternative for Web API with self documenting abilities using Hydra. It's
> not yet fully implemented but its quite advanced. I can setup it on GitHub
> if you'r interested. I was going to publish it anyway, but now I will have
> a reason to do this sooner than later.
>
> Regards
>
> Karrol Szczepański
>
>
> -------- Oryginalna wiadomość --------
> Od: Pano Maria
> Data:21.09.2015 17:04 (GMT+01:00)
> Do: Tomasz Pluskiewicz , public-hydra@w3.org
> Temat: RE: about those bonus points...
>
> > First, welcome to the list
>
> Thanks!
>
> > Second, you write that you are looking into describing your .NET API
> with Hydra. Are you also consuming
> > it in .NET? I have started some work on Hydra descriptions in .NET using
> JSON-LD and Newtonsoft.Json for
> > consumption in JS. Also Karol Szczepański, who is active on this list
> has been dosing some work in that
> > field, though I don't know the details.
>
> No, we're only starting up at the moment. Our development team is familiar
> with ASP.NET Web API so that's
> the route we're looking into first. For consumption our first plan is to
> do so in JS with a simple
> application. So your project is a very interesting reference.
>
> > So far my Hydra project is part of a larger solution [1]. I went the
> path of attribute annotations and
> > simple json-ld object serializer [2]
> >
> > Have you already done any implementation? Maybe we could share our
> experiences or combine some effort?
>
> No, not much yet. We have really just started but I hope to get up and
> running quite quickly in the coming
> weeks. I am definitely interested in sharing experiences, and possibly
> combining some effort, in time. I
> will definitely get in touch.
> Thanks again!
>
> Pano
>