Re: Moving forward with hydra:filter (ISSUE-45)

Hi,

Am 31.10.2015 16:59 schrieb Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>:

>
> >> Maybe it's worth of considering a default value predicate for mappings? 
> >That seems like a good idea! 
> Just thinking: 
> - hydra:hasDefaultValue 
> - hydra:defaultValue 
> - hydra:default 
> - hydra:fallbackValue 
> - hydra:fallback 
>
> I'd also think about a "null" or "nothing" value. Unfortunately, rdf:nil 
> cannot be used here but actually it's function is what we might seek. 

Both SHACL and schema:PropertyValueSpecification allow to specify a default value. I also think it is necessary. But we are getting ahead of Markus' agenda...

D'

Received on Saturday, 31 October 2015 22:10:27 UTC