Interest in HTTP Problem RDF Internet Draft?

Hi,

our discussion about the http-problem internet draft[1], ended with
Markus' statement that "If [http-problem] will be widely adopted, we
still have the luxury to be able to change Hydra".

Apparently IETF has earlier pointed Melvin Carvalho to http-problem as a
possible solution response format for an HTTP 402 Payment Required
status code [4].

Anyway, our discussion has continued off-list and finally Erik Wilde has
started an I-D http-problem-rdf at [2]. I wanted to inform the group
about it, in case someone is interested.

The purpose of the I-D is basically the same as that of the http-problem
draft: "This document defines a "problem
detail" as a way to carry machine-readable details of errors in a HTTP
response, to avoid the need to invent new error response formats for
HTTP APIs" with the additional goal to make the semantics of the
http-problem media types available for RDF based representations, too.

Now the question: would it be OK to use the *still empty* contrib
mailing list public-hydra-contrib@w3.org for discussions? Or would the
group even be more comfortable if discussions took place here?

Best regards,
Dietrich

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2015Sep/0044.html
[2] https://github.com/dret/I-D/tree/master/http-problem-rdf
[3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra-contrib/
[4]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments/2015Jun/0056.html

Received on Friday, 30 October 2015 13:19:40 UTC