- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:05:05 +0100
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
Changing the subject to create a new thread. On Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:50 PM, Karol Szczepański wrote: > I suggested having a separate predicate for a specific page number in > the template earlied during the consensus discussion. > > It ended up with discussing that later once the collection view > approach is agreed. > > On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 6:47 PM, László Lajos Jánszky wrote: >> I was wondering, is there a way to control the available links? I mean >> first, prev, next, last is not always enough. Even google use different >> type of pagination strategy. 3 random sites with pagination: >> 1. google `[f] [p] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10*] [11] [12] [13] [14] [n] [l]` >> 2. garmin forum `[page-select-input] [f] [p] [41] [49] [50] [51*] [52] >> [53] [61] [101] [151] [n] [l]` >> 3. a random forum `[f] [p] [page-select-input] [n] [l] >> {items-per-page-select-input}` It seems there seems to be enough interest to discuss this. I created ISSUE-102 [1] to track this. Let's start by collecting desired features. I've created a Wiki page to do so: https://www.w3.org/community/hydra/wiki/Client-initiated_pagination Please add your ideas there. This will give us a good overview of what people need and we can then decide on how to proceed from there. I'd propose to collect ideas there for about a week (roughly till Nov. 5th) and I'll then organize them (if necessary) and kick off a discussion on the mailing list. Sounds good? [1] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/102 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2015 21:05:36 UTC