- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:26:45 -0400
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
Hi Markus, > I think, however, that is a semantically sound approach > that has some nice advantages over the alternatives considered so far - not > the least that the approach nicely generalizes to other use cases. +1 A "view" seemed indeed to be the missing link. Probably this was why we had so much trouble modeling this in the past. A collection can indeed be viewed in multiple ways, and one of them is a specific pagination. This doesn't exclude anything else that can be done with the collection. > Please note that the collection members are directly associated to the > collection itself, not the view. This means that there's no need to > separately tie back each member of the collection to the collection itself. Very good. > I deliberately didn't use "page" or "pagination" in the name of the type of > this view (PartialCollectionView). +1 > Is anything missing? How do we say: the current page is part of / a page of this view? I.e. the predicate for "is a(ny) page of" will be needed. Best, Ruben
Received on Sunday, 11 October 2015 22:27:18 UTC