Hi Karol
> On October 9, 2015 at 8:05 PM Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> There is also a possibility of using a typed literal. RDF 1.1 spec
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/) mentions a rdf:HTML
> (or rdf:XMLLiteral) datatype which can be applied to literals and it denotes
> that the literal contains a HTML markup. This is not as clean as a separate
> content-negotiated referenced resource, but it's an option. Still it doesn't
> solve issues like "I'd like also to have a BB or markdown description"
I've not seen any instances of rdf:HTML being used in the wild. Anyone know of
any?
>
> Best
>
> Karol
>
John