- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 13:55:37 +0200
- To: "'Hydra'" <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 3 Okt 2015 at 09:55, Dietrich Schulten wrote: > I think we need Markus' help to sort out priorities and it would really > make me happy to see us working on the things which stop me from using > Hydra in my field. The work on the core vocab in the order I think it makes most sense to tackle it looks somewhat like this: - finish collection design - discuss the model of operations overall - define how to express the "expects" part of operations (considering the RDF Data Shapes WG's proposals) - extend the expects part to other request formats; not just RDF-based ones but also for example application/x-www-form-urlencoded, plain JSON, binary/multipart data etc. That would make integration with existing web frameworks *much* simpler - define the ApiDocumentation part Along the way, we should get in the habit again to keep the spec up to date. We should also have a discussion on how to restructure the spec. Probably after finalizing the collection design. How does that sound? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2015 11:55:56 UTC