Re: the necessity of describing responses in-band

Hi John,

>> The document would be named </items/10268448>,
>> the resource you're after would be named </items/10268448#id>.
> 
> Does it make sense to update examples from the post accordingly, just to please the purists ;)

Thanks for the suggestion. Done for all non-information resources.

The results pages are information resources that can be directly represented,
so there's no need to distinguish there.

>>> So </items/10268448.ttl> and </items/10268448.jsonld> for the Turtle and JSON-LD
>>> respectively.
>> 
>> That hinder interoperability between clients that use different media types.
>> We need an identifier for the document as well, regardless of media type.
> 
> Presumably to enable PUT/PATCH requests and so on?

Yeah, and just so they know they're talking about the same thing.
If one client is talking about </items/10268448.ttl>,
and another is talking about </items/10268448.jsonld>,
are they talking about the same thing?
If they use the same identifiers, we know the answer immediately.

Best,

Ruben

Received on Thursday, 8 October 2015 08:10:32 UTC