- From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:57:28 +0200
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
2015-09-30 21:35 GMT+02:00 Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>: > Exactly, JSON-LD makes it trivial for developers to frame/re-compact the > data so that it uses the property names that are most convenient for them. Sure. I don't expect most people to understand how to do this, though. > We won't dictate the context that everyone needs to use. We can off a > pluralized version of the context down the road if people think that will > make the JSON-LD serialization nicer [...] Changing the serialization will break old clients that aren't built around the dynamic nature of JSON-LD, but instead based on the plain JSON. While these clients in many ways get what they deserve, they are what I as an API provider have to cater to. If Hydra can make it easier to cater to these naïve clients without much effort and deviations from the default, it would be great. > but let's try to first tackle important open issues before we start reopening > old discussions. Sure. I agree this isn't the most important problem to tackle. A prioritized list (from your perspective) would be great to see. :-) -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjorn@ulsberg.no «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 08:58:15 UTC