- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 20:59:36 +0100
- To: Maik Riechert <maik.riechert@arcor.de>, public-hydra@w3.org
Maik, On 2015-11-14 20:09, Maik Riechert wrote: > Hi Tomasz! > >> I would turn this around. Where does /users go when the @id is >> /users?name=Bob? How about sth like that >> >> GET /users?name=Bob&p=1 >> { >> "@id": "/users?name=Bob", >> "partOf": "/users" >> "@type": "Collection", >> "member": [ ...10 Bob items... ], >> "totalItems": 50, >> "view": { .. the page links ... } >> } >> >> My idea would be to always use the parametrized @id (so that you can >> bookmark it) and add a link to the unfiltered collection, here >> "partOf" as an example. > > After I sent the email I had the same thoughts and I agree, it makes > more sense to browse through the filtered collection, especially because > totalItems works then. I also thought about how to link to the > unfiltered collection, that's tricky. > To complete this train of thought, I would point out that this is how this works in HTML. You normally see a summary similar to "displaying 10 out of 50 items" and that total number usually (always?) means the number of filtered results. > To help think about it, let's imagine we subclass Collection and use > something like FilteredCollection which could then include some custom > predicates like "appliedFilter": {"name": "Bob"}, and the link to the > unfiltered collection which should be unambiguous. I think partOf > (dct:isPartOf) is way too generic and doesn't really fit. I typically > think of partOf as non-overlapping things that make up a given resource. > What about dct:source instead? "A related resource from which the > described resource is derived." > Your idea seems sound. I'd have to defer that to other on this list for detailed discussion. My thought is that the "appliedFilter" is essentially an instance of a IriTemplate with variables filled in. I would model it with the IriTemplate in mind. Regarding partOf preficate, I didn't mean Dublin Core specifically. Though dct:source probably has a different intended use. Regards, Tom
Received on Saturday, 14 November 2015 20:00:15 UTC